Immediate effects of three different upper trapezius trigger point techniques on pain intensity and pressure threshold in students with cervical pain: a randomized clinical trial

relationships.isProjectOf

relationships.isOrgUnitOf

relationships.isJournalIssueOf

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of three manual therapy protocols (Jones, Lewit, and Chaitow) with a sham group in terms of pain pressure threshold and intensity. Participants: Fifty-two physiotherapy bachelor students with neck pain lasting more than 3 days were recruited. Outcomes: Pain was assessed with Numerical Rating Scale and Pressure Algometer, while cervical range of motion was evaluated with the Baiobit Inertial sensor. Intervention: An investigator, independent of the assessment and randomization, conducted all the interventions and sham procedures. Specifically, the Jones group received pincer palpation with a 1-min duration of ischemic compression, followed by 90 s of the no-pain Strain-Counterstrain technique. The Lewit group underwent flat palpation for 1 min, accompanied by 40 s of intermittent compression and post-isometric relaxation. The Chaitow group received deep palpation for 1 min, followed by the pressure release position lasting 20 s to 1 min, concluding with the muscle energy technique. The Sham group received only flat palpation and a 3-min homolateral muscle shortening position. Results: Effects for all three techniques (Chaitow/Lewit/Jones) when comparing them to sham were not significant on pain intensity . No adverse events or undesirable effects were observed during the study. Conclusion: Immediate effects on pain intensity and pressure threshold are not directly attributable to any of the three tested trigger techniques.

Description

Bibliographic citation

Todri, J., Lena, O., Vázquez-Villa, C., Martínez-Fuentes, J., Ciferri, A., & Murcia-González, M. A. (2025). Immediate effects of three different upper trapezius trigger point techniques on pain intensity and pressure threshold in students with cervical pain: a randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, 58, 100777.

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional