Bioequivalence Study of Two Long-Acting Formulations of Oxytetracycline Following Intramuscular Administration in Bovines

dc.contributor.authorMestorino, Nora
dc.contributor.authorMarchetti, Maria Laura
dc.contributor.authorLucas, Maria Florencia
dc.contributor.authorModamio, Pilar
dc.contributor.authorZeinsteger, Pedro
dc.contributor.authorFernandez Lastra, Cecilia
dc.contributor.authorSegarra, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorMariño, Eduardo
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-02T10:57:56Z
dc.date.available2019-10-02T10:57:56Z
dc.date.issued2016-06-23
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of two commercial long-acting formulations based on oxytetracycline (OTC) hydrochloride between the reference formulation (Terramycin LA, Pfizer) and a test formulation (Cyamicin LA, Fort Dodge Saude Animal). Both formulations were administered in a single intramuscular route at a dose of 20 mg OTC/kg of body weight in clinically healthy bovines. The study was carried out according to a one-period parallel design. Plasma samples were analyzed by high-pressure liquid chromatography. The limit of quantitation was 0.050 μg/mL with an accuracy of 101.67% with a coefficient of variation of 13.15%. Analysis of variance and 90% confidence interval tests were used to compare the bioavailability parameters (maximum plasma concentration, Cmax, and the area under the concentration-versus-time curve extrapolated to infinity, AUC0–∞) of both products. In the case of the time to maximum concentration (Tmax), non-parametric tests based on Wilcoxon’s signed rank test were preferred. The comparison of the mean AUC0–∞ values did not reveal any significant differences (311.40 ± 93.05 μg h/mL and 287.71 ± 45.31 μg h/mL, respectively). The results were similar for the Tmax (3.58 ± 0.90 h versus 3.42 ± 0.51 h). However, when comparing the mean Cmax some significant differences were found (8.73 ± 3.66 μg/mL and 10.43 ± 3.84 μg/mL, respectively). The 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of AUC0–∞ and Tmax values for the reference and test product are within the interval 80–125%, but the 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of Cmax falls outside the proposed interval. It was concluded that Cmax of test product are not within the 20% of those of the reference, thus suggesting that test OTC is not bioequivalent to the reference formulation.es
dc.description.disciplineFarmaciaes
dc.description.disciplineMedicinaes
dc.identifier.citationMestorino N, Marchetti ML, Lucas MF, Modamio P, Zeinsteger P, Fernández Lastra C, Segarra I and Mariño EL (2016) Bioequivalence Study of Two Long-Acting Formulations of Oxytetracycline Following Intramuscular Administration in Bovines. Front. Vet. Sci. 3:50. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00050es
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fvets.2016.00050es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10952/4095
dc.issue.number50es
dc.journal.titleFrontiers in Veterinary Sciencees
dc.language.isoenes
dc.publisherFrontierses
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectBioequivalencees
dc.subjectPharmacokineticses
dc.subjectOxytetracyclinees
dc.subjectBovinees
dc.titleBioequivalence Study of Two Long-Acting Formulations of Oxytetracycline Following Intramuscular Administration in Bovineses
dc.typejournal articlees
dc.volume.number3es
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
fvets-03-00050.pdf
Size:
401.59 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

Collections