Por labores de mantenimiento, el Repositorio Institucional UCAM (RIUCAM) dejará de estar disponible a partir del martes 13 de octubre y hasta nuevo aviso. Disculpen las molestias.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorGarcia Atutxa, Igor
dc.contributor.authorVillanueva Flores, Francisca
dc.contributor.authorDudagotia Barrio, Ekaitz
dc.contributor.authorSanchez Villamil, Javier I.
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Más, José
dc.contributor.authorBueno Crespo, Andrés
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-09T09:02:30Z
dc.date.available2025-12-09T09:02:30Z
dc.date.issued2025-11-05
dc.identifier.citationGarcia-Atutxa I, Villanueva-Flores F, Barrio ED, Sanchez-Villamil JI, Martínez-Más J and Bueno-Crespo A (2025) Artificial intelligence for ovarian cancer diagnosis via ultrasound: a systematic review and quantitative assessment of model performance. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 8:1649746. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1649746es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10952/10525
dc.description.abstractBackground: Early and accurate detection of ovarian cancer (OC) remains clinically challenging, prompting exploration of artificial intelligence (AI)-based ultrasound diagnostics. This systematic review and meta-analysis critically evaluate diagnostic accuracy, methodological rigor, and clinical applicability of AI models for ovarian mass classification using B-mode ultrasound. Methods: A systematic literature search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted in PubMed, IEEE Xplore, and Scopus up to December 2024. Eligible studies included AI-based ovarian mass classification using B-mode ultrasound, reporting accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and/or area under the ROC curve (AUC). Data extraction, quality assessment (PROBAST), and metaanalysis (random effects) were independently performed by two reviewers. Heterogeneity sources were explored. Results: From 823 identified records, 44 studies met inclusion criteria, covering over 650,000 images. Pooled performance metrics indicated high accuracy (92.3%), sensitivity (91.6%), specificity (90.1%), and AUC (0.93). Automated segmentation significantly outperformed manual segmentation in accuracy and sensitivity, demonstrating standardization benefits and reduced observer variability. Dataset size minimally correlated with performance, highlighting methodological rigor as a primary determinant. No specific AI architecture consistently outperformed others. Substantial methodological heterogeneity and frequent risk-of-bias issues (limited validation, small datasets) currently limit clinical translation. Conclusion: AI models show promising diagnostic performance for OC ultrasound imaging. However, addressing methodological challenges, including rigorous validation, standardized reporting (TRIPOD-AI, STARD-AI), and prospective multicenter studies, is essential for clinical integration. This review provides clear recommendations to enhance clinical translation of AI-based ultrasound diagnostics.es
dc.language.isoenes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectMeta-analysises
dc.subjectArtificial Intelligencees
dc.subjectUltrasoundes
dc.subjectOvarian canceres
dc.subjectEarly detectiones
dc.subjectDeep learninges
dc.subjectSystematic reviewes
dc.titleArtificial intelligence for ovarian cancer diagnosis via ultrasound: a systematic review and quantitative assessment of model performancees
dc.typereviewes
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses
dc.description.disciplineIngeniería, Industria y Construcciónes
dc.description.disciplineMedicinaes
dc.description.facultyEscuela Politécnicaes


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional