| dc.contributor.author | Jasemin, Todri | |
| dc.contributor.author | Enkeleda, Gjini, | |
| dc.contributor.author | Orges, Lena | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-22T08:13:48Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-01-22T08:13:48Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-12-13 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Todri J, Gjini E, Lena O. Assessment properties of the Visual Analogue scale, Numeric Rating Scale, Face Pain Scale, and Pain Intensity Subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory in Albanian population with low back pain. Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2601406. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2601406. Epub 2025 Dec 13. PMID: 41388783; PMCID: PMC12704113. | es |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0785-3890 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10952/10684 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Pain intensity is the primary variable assessed in clinical trials for low
back pain. A precise assessment of pain intensity is vital for the informed selection of
medical and rehabilitation treatments; it represents a notable challenge in clinical
settings.
Methods: The four pain intensity scales – Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Numeric Rating
Scale (NRS), Faces Pain Scale (FPS), and Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-IS) – were administered
to 200 Albanian participants with low back pain at a regional healthcare center in
Albania with a mean age of 69.77 and a standard deviation (SD) of 6.34. The mean of
pain duration was 3.51 with a SD of 0.72. Participants were subsequently asked to
assess four domains of pain intensity – worst pain, average pain, least pain over the
past week, and current pain. The data collection occurred during the patients’ initial
visits for low back complaints. To assess the convergent validity of the scales –
specifically, the relationship between each scale and a composite score of all measures,
a principal components analysis was performed.
Results: There were significant correlations among the four scales across all domains of
pain intensity in the 200 participants. The screen test from the principal component
analyses indicated that the four scales captured a single overarching domain for each
of the four pain intensity areas, with the first eigenvalue ranging from 2.33 to 3.63 and
the second from 0.16 to 0.43. Moreover, all the scales showed a strong loading on the
single component that emerged. The four scales had the highest loading on ‘current
pain’ component (>0.9).
Conclusion: The VAS, NRS, FPS and BPI-IS are valid and can be used for the clinical and
research implication in the Albanian population. | es |
| dc.language.iso | en | es |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
| dc.subject | Measurement | es |
| dc.subject | Pain intensity | es |
| dc.subject | Validity | es |
| dc.subject | Albanian population | es |
| dc.title | Assessment properties of the Visual Analogue scale, Numeric Rating Scale, Face Pain Scale, and Pain Intensity Subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory in Albanian population with low back pain. | es |
| dc.type | journal article | es |
| dc.rights.accessRights | open access | es |
| dc.journal.title | Annals of Medicine | es |
| dc.volume.number | 57 | es |
| dc.issue.number | 1, 2601406 | es |
| dc.description.discipline | Terapia y Rehabilitación | es |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/07853890.2025.2601406 | es |
| dc.description.faculty | Fisioterapia, Podología y Terapia Ocupacional | es |