Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCalvo Guirado, José Luis
dc.contributor.authorJiménez Soto, Raúl
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Albacete Martínez, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorFernández Domínguez, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorGehrke, Sergio Alexandre
dc.contributor.authorMaté Sánchez de Val, José Eduardo
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-19T10:44:09Z
dc.date.available2018-11-19T10:44:09Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-17
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10952/3587
dc.descriptionThis article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).es
dc.description.abstractAbstract: This in vivo study assessed (hard and soft) peri-implant tissue remodeling around implants with micro-ring and open-thread neck designs placed in a dog model. Twenty histological sections corresponding to four different implant designs that were placed in America Foxhound dogs were obtained from previous studies. All the implants had been placed under identical conditions and were divided into four groups: Group A, micro-rings on implant neck plus 0.5 mm refined surface; Group B, micro-rings on implant neck; Group C, open-thread neck; and, Group D, double-spiral neck. Eight weeks after surgery, the integrated implants were removed and processed for histological examination. Crestal bone loss and bone-to-implant contact was greater for micro-ring necks than open-thread necks. Soft tissues showed significant differences on both buccal and lingual aspects, so that the distance from peri-implant mucosa to the apical portion of the barrier epithelium was smaller in the micro-ring groups. So, in spite of generating greater bone-to-implant contact, implants with micro rings produced more bone loss than open-thread implants. Moreover, the outcomes that were obtained IPX implants smooth neck design produced less bone loss in the cervical area, following by Facility implants when compared with the other open thread and microthreaded implant designs. Implant thread design can influence on bone remodeling in the cervical area, related to bundle bone preservation.es
dc.language.isoenes
dc.publisherMDPI, Basel, Switzerlandes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectBone levelses
dc.subjectDental implantes
dc.subjectNeck designes
dc.subjectSoft tissue dimensionses
dc.titleInfluence of Implant Neck Design on Peri-Implant Tissue Dimensions: A Comparative Study in Dogses
dc.title.alternativeInfluence of Implant Neck Design on Peri-Implant Tissue Dimensions: A Comparative Study in Dogses
dc.typearticlees
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses
dc.journal.titleMaterialses
dc.volume.number11es
dc.description.disciplineOdontologíaes
dc.identifier.doidoi:10.3390/ma11102007es


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional