Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMarhuenda Hernández, Javier
dc.contributor.authorArcusa Saura, Raúl
dc.contributor.authorSerna Oñate, Ana
dc.contributor.authorVictoria Montesinos, Desirée
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Macarro, Maravillas
dc.contributor.authorAbellán Ruiz, María Salud
dc.contributor.authorQuinde, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.authorRizo Patrón, Alejandra Mariana
dc.contributor.authorLópez Román, Francisco Javier
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-07T14:15:23Z
dc.date.available2024-03-07T14:15:23Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-25
dc.identifier.citationMarhuenda Hernández J, Arcusa Saura R, Serna Oñate A, Victoria Montesinos D, Sánchez Macarro M, Abellán Ruiz MS, Quinde FJ, Rizo-Patrón AM, López Román FJ. The quality of pasta versus rice is determining to control hunger and appetite: A comparative study of pasta and rice. Rev Esp Nutr Hum Diet. 2020; 24(3): 268-77. doi: 10.14306/renhyd.24.3.1034es
dc.identifier.issn2174-5145
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10952/7460
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The aim of the present study was to evaluate if the pasta quality is decisive in controlling hunger and satiety compared with rice. Material and methods: n=16 (8 men, 8 women). The effect on appetite and satiety of two different-quality pastas and also rice was determined by repeated measuring. Subjects came on fasting and were evaluated at different times after the intake of product under investigation for 240 min, eaten an ad libitum buffet and were evaluated again at minute 270. Aspects related to satiety (hunger, satiety, fullness, and desire to eat) were evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS), overall appetite score (OAS), area under curve (AUC) and satiety quotient (SQ). Results: The OAS reported by volunteers prior to the intake of products under investigation did not differ significantly, so baseline parameters did not bias later measurements. AUC after 60 minutes was higher after the intake of rice (2355 ±1556%/min) compared with both types of pasta. On the other hand, similar values were obtained between the two types of pasta (pasta A = 1808 ± 1329 % /min; pasta B = 1,774 ± 1,370%/min). Further, AUC reported by volunteers after 240 minutes was higher after the intake of rice (12,424 ± 6,187%/min) compared with both types of pastas (pasta A = 10,292 ± 5,410%/min; pasta B = 9,976 ± 5,589%/min). In addition, SQ was lower for rice (1.90 ± 4.29%/kcal) than for both pastas (pasta A = 4.73 ± 4.95%/kcal; pasta B = 4.40 ± 5.14%/kcal). Conclusions: Both varieties of pasta showed higher satiety results than rice, with no significant difference between them. In addition, the difference between rice and pasta was greater within 60 minutes after ingestion.es
dc.language.isoenes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectNutritional Physiological Phenomenaes
dc.subjectAppetite Regulationes
dc.subjectAppetitees
dc.subjectSatiationes
dc.subjectSatiety Responsees
dc.subjectVisual Analog Scalees
dc.subjectFoodes
dc.subjectOryzaes
dc.subjectRicees
dc.subjectPastaes
dc.titleThe quality of pasta versus rice is determining to control hunger and appetite: A comparative study of pasta and ricees
dc.typearticlees
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses
dc.journal.titleRevista Española de Nutrición Humana y Dietéticaes
dc.volume.number24es
dc.issue.number3es
dc.description.disciplineCiencias de la Alimentaciónes
dc.description.disciplineFarmaciaes
dc.description.disciplineMedicinaes
dc.identifier.doi10.14306/renhyd.24.3.1034es


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional