Consequences of applying the different criteria of the EWGSOP2 guideline for sarcopenia case-finding in Spanish community-dwelling older adults

Abstract

Introduction: Sarcopenia prevalence varies according to differences in diagnostic criteria used. In order to overcome this issue, the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People-2 (EWGSOP2) published a consensus to increase harmonization for sarcopenia diagnosis. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors across the different sarcopenia diagnosis criteria recommended by EWGSOP2 and to analyze its agreement. Methods: A total of 699 community-dwelling older adults (median-age: 72, 60% female) were recruited in this cross-sectional study. Sarcopenia prevalence was obtained by different combinations of muscle strength (handgrip strength or 5-times sit-to-stand) and muscle quantity (appendicular skeletal mass or skeletal muscle index) as recommended by the EWGSOP2. Cohen's Kappa coefficient was calculated to analyze agreement among the four sarcopenia diagnostic criteria and logistic regressions were performed to identify risks associated to health-related outcomes for each diagnostic criterion. Results: Sarcopenia prevalence varied from 2.1% to 11.6%, depending on the diagnostic criteria used. Weak-to-moderate agreements (κ-range: 0.13-0.66) were observed among the four sarcopenia diagnosis criteria. There was scarce overlap in sarcopenic people when different diagnostic criteria were used leading to up to 10.4% of underdiagnosis. Sarcopenia defined by 5-times sit-to-stand was more associated with health-related outcomes compared to handgrip strength. Conclusions: Sarcopenia prevalence rates vary considerably depending on the diagnostic criteria used. These criteria should not be used in an interchangeable way due to their weak agreement. Sarcopenia diagnosis criteria defined by 5-times sit-to-stand could be more suitable in Spanish community-dwelling older adults due their associations with health-related outcomes.