Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorFriling, Marina
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Muñoz, Ana María
dc.contributor.authorPerrinjaquet Moccetti, Tania
dc.contributor.authorVictoria Montesinos, Desirée
dc.contributor.authorPérez Piñero, Desirée
dc.contributor.authorPérez Piñero, Silvia
dc.contributor.authorAbellán Ruiz, María Salud
dc.contributor.authorLuque Rubia, Antonio J.
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Guillén, Ana Isabel
dc.contributor.authorCánovas García, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorIvanir, Eran
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-09T08:07:06Z
dc.date.available2024-09-09T08:07:06Z
dc.date.issued2022-10-14
dc.identifier.issn1422-0067
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10952/8186
dc.description.abstractA single-center, crossover, randomized, double-blind, and controlled clinical study was conducted to assess the tolerability profile, especially with regard to gastrointestinal complaints, of oral supplementation with AB-Fortis®, a microencapsulated ferric saccharate (MFS), as compared with conventional ferrous sulphate (FS) in healthy premenopausal women. A dose of 60 mg/day of elemental iron was used. The test products were administered for 14 consecutive days with a washout period of two menstrual episodes and a minimum of one month between the two intervention periods. The subjects completed simple-to-answer questionnaires daily for 14 days during both the intervention and the washout periods, capturing the symptoms associated with oral iron supplementation and overall health aspects. Following product consumption, the incidences of symptoms, numbers of complaints/symptoms, overall intensity, and total days with symptoms were found to be significantly higher for FS consumption as compared to MFS. The better tolerability profile of MFS over FS was further substantiated when both products were compared to a real-life setting (i.e., the washout period). Overall, the administration of both study products was safe with no serious or significant adverse events reported. In summary, the current study shows the better tolerability of the MFS preparation when compared to that of the FS, presenting MFS as a well-tolerated and safe option for improving iron nutrition.es
dc.language.isoenes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectIron supplementationes
dc.subjectAB-Fortis®es
dc.subjectMicroencapsulated irones
dc.subjectFerric saccharatees
dc.subjectFerrous sulphatees
dc.subjectGastrointestinal side effectses
dc.subjectTolerabilityes
dc.titleTolerability of Oral Supplementation with Microencapsulated Ferric Saccharate Compared to Ferrous Sulphate in Healthy Premenopausal Woman: A Crossover, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Triales
dc.typearticlees
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses
dc.journal.titleInternational Journal of Molecular Scienceses
dc.volume.number23es
dc.issue.number20es
dc.description.disciplineCiencias de la Alimentaciónes
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijms232012282es


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional