Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOrtega Quiñonero, Paloma
dc.contributor.authorRemezal Solano, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorCarazo Díaz, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorPrieto Merino, David
dc.contributor.authorUrbano Reyes, María Isabel
dc.contributor.authorGarcía de Guadiana Romualdo, Luis
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Cendán, Juan Pedro
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-27T15:40:24Z
dc.date.available2025-01-27T15:40:24Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationP. Ortega-quiñonero, M. Remezal-solano, M.c. Carazo-díaz, D. Prieto-merino, M.i. Urbano-reyes, L. García De Guadiana-romualdo, J.p. Martínez-cendán. Impact of the human papillomavirus vaccination on patients who underwent conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(3);402-407. https://www.ejgo.net/articles/10.12892/ejgo4628.2019es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10952/8956
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To test whether the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in patients undergoing loop diathermy conization (LEEP) for high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2-3) is effective in preventing recurrence of CIN 2-3 in our area. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 242 patients undergoing LEEP for CIN 2-3 and 42.6% received the HPV vaccine (bivalent or tetravalent) immediately before or after conization. Follow up was conducted at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months to detect CIN 2-3 recurrence. Results: Regardless of the HPV type, 27 (11.1%) patients developed CIN 2-3 recurrence during post-LEEP follow up. Of the 70 vaccinated with bivalent vaccine, two (2.8%) showed recurrence, of the 33 vaccinated with tetravalent vaccine, three (9%), and of the 139 unvaccinated 61 (43.9%) developed recurrence. Of the patients infected with HPV genotypes 16/18, in the non-vaccinated group, 15 (21.7%) patients had recurrence, whereas in the vaccinated group, three (5.9%) were diagnosed with recurrence (p < 0/05). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the vaccination acted as a protective factor for CIN 2-3 recurrence (OR: 0.360 (95% CI: 0.125-1.000; p < 0.05). However, neither the type of vaccine nor the time of vaccination showed a significant association with the onset of recurrence. Conclusions: The HPV vaccine appears to be a recommendable preventative strategy in reducing the risk of recurrent disease for patients treated for CIN 2-3.es
dc.language.isoenes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectHuman papillomaviruses
dc.subjectVaccinees
dc.subjectCervical intraepithelial neoplasiaes
dc.subjectRecurrent disease; Conizationes
dc.subjectLEEPes
dc.titleImpact of the human papillomavirus vaccination on patients who underwent conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasiaes
dc.typejournal articlees
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses
dc.journal.titleEuropean Journal of Gynaecological Oncologyes
dc.volume.number40es
dc.issue.number3es
dc.description.disciplineMedicinaes
dc.identifier.doi10.12892/ejgo4628.2019es
dc.description.facultyMedicinaes


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional