Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFreitas, Tomás T.
dc.contributor.authorCalleja González, Julio
dc.contributor.authorAlarcón López, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorAlcaraz Ramón, Pedro Emilio
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-10T08:17:42Z
dc.date.available2018-05-10T08:17:42Z
dc.date.issued2016-02
dc.identifier.citationFreitas, T. T., Calleja-González, J., Alarcón, F., & Alcaraz, P. E. (2016). Acute effects of two different resistance circuit training protocols on performance and perceived exertion in semiprofessional basketball players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 30(2), 407-414.es
dc.identifier.other10.1519/JSC.0000000000001123
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10952/3103
dc.description.abstractAcute effects of two different resistance circuit training protocols on performance and perceived exertion in semiprofessional basketball players. J Strength Cond Res 30(2): 407–414, 2016—This study aimed to investigate the acute effects of two different resistance circuit training protocols on basketball players' physical and technical performance and rating of perceived exertion (RPE). In a repeated-measures, crossover experimental design, 9 semiprofessional basketball players performed a Power Circuit Training (PCT; 45% 1RM) and a High-Resistance Circuit Training (HRC; 6RM), on consecutive weeks. Vertical and horizontal jump performance, 3-points shooting accuracy, repeated-sprint ability (RSA), agility, and upper body power output were measured before and after training. The RPE was assessed 20 minutes after resistance training. One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance showed performance decrements in vertical jump height and peak power, horizontal jump distance, 3-points percentage, bench-press power output, RSA total and ideal time, and agility T-Test at total time following HRC, but not PCT (p <= 0.05). The RPE was higher in HRC compared with PCT. The results of this study indicated that HRC was perceived as being harder and produced higher fatigue levels, which in turn lowered acute performance. However, low-to-moderate intensity loads did not negatively affect performance. Thus, completing a PCT session may be the most appropriate option before a practice or game as it avoids acute–resistance–training-induced performance decrements. However, if the objective of the basketball session is to develop or perfect technical skills during fatiguing conditions, HRC may be the more suitable option.es
dc.language.isoenes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectPoweres
dc.subjectStrengthes
dc.subjectBasketballes
dc.subjectRepeated sprint abilityes
dc.subjectVertical jumpes
dc.subjectShootinges
dc.titleAcute Effects of Two Different Resistance Circuit Training Protocols on Performance and Perceived Exertion in Semiprofessional Basketball Playerses
dc.typearticlees
dc.rights.accessRightsopenAccesses
dc.journal.titleJournal of Strength and Conditioning Researches
dc.volume.number30es
dc.issue.number2es
dc.description.disciplineActividad Física y Deportees


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional